I
think it's safe to assume most people want to die in peace. Not only that, but
they want their families to be able to grieve in peace.
When
my phone blew up with the latest breaking news, it made me wonder: wouldn't
celebrities and their families appreciate the same courtesy?
Celebrities
receive less protection under privacy laws then citizens who do not chose to be
in the public eye. So, journalists have the right (in some cases, an
obligation) to be more critical of their actions and, in some ways, invade
their privacy. But, is dying different? I mean, the guy died TODAY. The family
is probably in shock. They’re dealing with the reality the their father, their
husband, uncle, or cousin is not longer with them. Now, each time they log onto
Facebook, Twitter, or any news site their pain is front-page.
I’m not suggesting for journalists to stop
doing their job of reporting newsworthy events. However, as I analyze the
coverage of the death of Dick Clark, it makes me think about the fact that
somewhere, this man’s family is grieving the loss of their loved one.
Perhaps we, as the media, should be a little more sensitive. This man was more
than a hot news story. Maybe we should give it some time, give the family room
to breathe.
This certainly isn’t the only celebrity death
story that has been breaking news before the family had time to blink.
The list goes on. Yes, journalists have an
obligation to publish relevant news stories. But journalists do not have the
obligation to hype-up celebrity deaths in order to gain readers and viewers. My
suggestion is that the media becomes a little more humane about the way we
cover celebrity deaths.







No comments:
Post a Comment